<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="wordpress.com" -->
<urlset xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
	xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.sitemaps.org/schemas/sitemap/0.9 http://www.sitemaps.org/schemas/sitemap/0.9/sitemap.xsd"
	xmlns="http://www.sitemaps.org/schemas/sitemap/0.9"
	xmlns:news="http://www.google.com/schemas/sitemap-news/0.9"
	xmlns:image="http://www.google.com/schemas/sitemap-image/1.1"
	>
<url><loc>https://paulmollicafederalcourtsblog.com/2026/08/26/ninth-circuit-holds-that-a-federal-court-may-exercise-supplemental-jurisdiction-over-a-state-law-claim-even-where-the-federal-claim-is-a-permissive-counterclaim-under-fed-r-civ-p-13b/</loc><news:news><news:publication><news:name>Paul Mollica&#039;s Federal Courts Blog</news:name><news:language>en</news:language></news:publication><news:publication_date>2026-08-27T00:18:21+00:00</news:publication_date><news:title>Ninth Circuit Holds That A Federal Court May Exercise Supplemental Jurisdiction Over a State Law Claim Even Where the Federal Claim is a Permissive Counterclaim Under Fed. R. Civ. P. 13(b)</news:title><news:keywords>Appellate Jurisdiction, Ninth Circuit, Supplemental Jurisdiction, Fed. R. Civ. P. 13, 28 U.S.C. § 1367(a), 28 U.S.C. § 1295(a)(1), Permissive Counterclaim, Compulsory Counterclaim, Common Nucleus of Operative Fact, Transaction or Occurence</news:keywords></news:news></url></urlset>
