<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="wordpress.com" -->
<urlset xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
	xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.sitemaps.org/schemas/sitemap/0.9 http://www.sitemaps.org/schemas/sitemap/0.9/sitemap.xsd"
	xmlns="http://www.sitemaps.org/schemas/sitemap/0.9"
	xmlns:news="http://www.google.com/schemas/sitemap-news/0.9"
	xmlns:image="http://www.google.com/schemas/sitemap-image/1.1"
	>
<url><loc>https://paulmollicafederalcourtsblog.com/2026/08/18/discovery-order-related-to-an-immunity-defense-was-not-a-collateral-order-subject-to-an-interlocutory-appeal-holds-d-c-circuit/</loc><news:news><news:publication><news:name>Paul Mollica&#039;s Federal Courts Blog</news:name><news:language>en</news:language></news:publication><news:publication_date>2026-08-18T16:22:17+00:00</news:publication_date><news:title>Discovery Order Related to an Immunity Defense Was Not a Collateral Order Subject to an Interlocutory Appeal, Holds D.C. Circuit</news:title><news:keywords>Appellate Jurisdiction, D.C. Circuit, Interlocutory Appeal, Collateral Order Doctrine, Discovery, Immunity, IOIA, FSIA</news:keywords></news:news></url></urlset>
