<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="wordpress.com" -->
<urlset xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
	xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.sitemaps.org/schemas/sitemap/0.9 http://www.sitemaps.org/schemas/sitemap/0.9/sitemap.xsd"
	xmlns="http://www.sitemaps.org/schemas/sitemap/0.9"
	xmlns:news="http://www.google.com/schemas/sitemap-news/0.9"
	xmlns:image="http://www.google.com/schemas/sitemap-image/1.1"
	>
<url><loc>https://paulmollicafederalcourtsblog.com/2026/09/16/eleventh-circuit-holds-that-it-is-not-an-abuse-of-discretion-for-district-court-to-retain-supplemental-jurisdiction-over-some-but-not-all-state-law-claims-after-plaintiff-abandons-the-federal-law-cl/</loc><news:news><news:publication><news:name>Paul Mollica&#039;s Federal Courts Blog</news:name><news:language>en</news:language></news:publication><news:publication_date>2026-09-16T18:55:15+00:00</news:publication_date><news:title>Eleventh Circuit Holds That It Is Not an Abuse of Discretion for District Court to Retain Supplemental Jurisdiction Over Some, But Not All, State-Law Claims After Plaintiff Abandons the Federal-Law Claims</news:title><news:keywords>Eleventh Circuit, Supplemental Jurisdiction, 28 U.S.C. § 1367(c)(3)</news:keywords></news:news></url></urlset>
