Blog

Eleventh Circuit Holds That It Is Not an Abuse of Discretion for District Court to Retain Supplemental Jurisdiction Over Some, But Not All, State-Law Claims After Plaintiff Abandons the Federal-Law Claims

In Mueller v. Walmart Corp., No. 23-12854 (11th Cir. Sept. 16, 2026), the Eleventh Circuit rejects a per se rule that a district court abuses its discretion by retaining supplemental jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1367(c)(3) over some, but not all, state-law claims after the principal federal law claims are dismissed (after the plaintiff abandoned…

pwmollica1961's avatar by pwmollica1961

Fifth Circuit Finds Appellate Jurisdiction and Holds That a State Anti-SLAPP Law Does Not Apply in Federal Court, Widening Circuit Splits on Both Issues

In Sahs v. Loyola Univ. New Orleans, No. 25-30263 (5th Cir. Sept. 11, 2026), a Fifth Circuit panel repudiates prior dicta from a 2016 decision and holds that Louisiana’s anti-SLAPP law is a procedural law that, under Erie principles, does not apply in federal court. In a separate opinion, dubitante, one panelist challenges the panel’s…

pwmollica1961's avatar by pwmollica1961

Tenth Circuit Holds That a Defense Presentation of Plaintiff’s “Cop-Watch” Social Media Posts at Trial Was Unduly Prejudicial Under Fed. R. Evid. 403, Warranting a New Trial

In Cronick v. City of Colorado Springs, No. 25-1235 (10th Cir. Aug. 28, 2026), the Tenth Circuit holds that cross-examining a plaintiff for about her “cop-watching” social media videos, in which she’s shown in police and security guard “encounters unrelated to the arrest at issue” in the case, was unduly prejudicial to the plaintiff under…

pwmollica1961's avatar by pwmollica1961

Archives:

Follow My Blog

Get new content delivered directly to your inbox.