Monthly Archives: October 2024

Grant of Preliminary Injunction by One Judge in the District Moots Appeal of Denial of Preliminary Injuction by Another Judge, Holds Tenth Circuit

In We the Patriots, et al. v. Grisham, No. 23-2066 (10th Cir. Oct. 28, 2024), the Tenth Circuit dismisses an appeal of the denial of preliminary injunction where, in a different case in the same district, another judge granted the same relief. This is important for cases governed by “prevailing party” fee-shifting statutes, because ifContinue reading “Grant of Preliminary Injunction by One Judge in the District Moots Appeal of Denial of Preliminary Injuction by Another Judge, Holds Tenth Circuit”

Ninth Circuit Reassigns a Case Where the Judge and Defendant Formerly Clerked Together for the Same Ninth Circuit Judge

In Creech v. U.S. Dist. Ct. for the District of Idaho, No. 24-4455 (9th Cir. Oct. 16, 2024), the Ninth Circuit grants mandamus to remove a district court judge in a case where the judge admitted a long-term friendship with one of the defendants, going back to when they were Ninth Circuit clerks. This comesContinue reading “Ninth Circuit Reassigns a Case Where the Judge and Defendant Formerly Clerked Together for the Same Ninth Circuit Judge”

State Need Not Allege A “Policy or Practice” Violation Against a Class of Citizens to Have Parens Patriae Standing in Federal Court, Second Circuit Holds

In New York v. Niagara-Wheatfield Central Sch. Dist., No. 22-2178 (2d Cir. Oct. 15, 2024), the Second Circuit reverses a Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(c) judgment on the pleadings, holding that the State of New York pled sufficient grounds for parens patriae standing without alleging a policy-or-practice violation against a target population of state residents.Continue reading “State Need Not Allege A “Policy or Practice” Violation Against a Class of Citizens to Have Parens Patriae Standing in Federal Court, Second Circuit Holds”

Fifth Circuit Orders Removal of District Court Judge from Institutional Reform Lawsuit for Alleged “Intemperate Conduct” During Contempt Proceedings

In M.D. v. Abbott, No. 24-40248 (5th Cir. Oct. 11, 2024), a Fifth Circuit panel reverses an order of contempt against the State of Texas and orders reassignment of a case involving the state’s foster care system to another federal district court judge. “Plaintiffs are a class of minor children who challenged the constitutionality ofContinue reading “Fifth Circuit Orders Removal of District Court Judge from Institutional Reform Lawsuit for Alleged “Intemperate Conduct” During Contempt Proceedings”

Corporation Counsel of the City of New York Draws A Rebuke from the Second Circuit for Waiting Two Years to Raise Jurisdictional Standing Issue

In Bochner v. City of New York, No. 23-683 (2d Cir. Oct. 7, 2024), while adopting the city defendants’ argument that the plaintiffs lacked jurisdictional standing, the Second Circuit twits the city’s corporation counsel for waiting two years to raise the issue and—for “failure to exercise reasonable diligence in identifying and raising jurisdictional questions earlyContinue reading “Corporation Counsel of the City of New York Draws A Rebuke from the Second Circuit for Waiting Two Years to Raise Jurisdictional Standing Issue”

Document Created 19 Days Before Trial Was Not A “Business Record” For Purposes of Hearsay Exception Fed. R. Evid. 803(6), Holds Tenth Circuit

In United States v. Harper, No. 23-5091 (10th Cir. Oct. 3, 2024), the Tenth Circuit reverses the kidnapping conviction where the only record of an essential jurisdictional element was a verification letter generated shortly before trial that the panel holds cannot thereby stand as a business record under Fed. R. Evid. 803(6). The defendant wasContinue reading “Document Created 19 Days Before Trial Was Not A “Business Record” For Purposes of Hearsay Exception Fed. R. Evid. 803(6), Holds Tenth Circuit”

Removal of Case from State to Federal Court Does Not Affect Application of First-Filed Rule, Split Eighth Circuit Panel Holds

In Beber v. NavSav Holdings, LLC, No. 23-2965 (8th Cir. Oct. 1, 2024), a 2-1 panel holds, in dueling lawsuits over noncompete and nonsolicitation covenants, that a first-filed case commenced in Nebraska state court remained first-filed even when removed to federal district court. Judge Kelly dissents in part. On June 16, 2023, employees Beber, Roach,Continue reading “Removal of Case from State to Federal Court Does Not Affect Application of First-Filed Rule, Split Eighth Circuit Panel Holds”