Uncategorized – Page 16 – Paul Mollica's Federal Courts Blog

Third Circuit Panel Splits Three Ways on Whether and How FDCPA Plaintiff Had Article III Standing Based on Ambiguous Balance Statement

In Huber v. Simons Agency Inc., No. 22-2483 (3d Cir. Oct. 12, 2023), each judge on the panel arrived at a different outcome about whether a plaintiff under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (“FDCPA”), 15 U.S.C. §§ 1692– 1692p, suffered an Article III injury because of receiving a debt-collection letter that arguably overstated theirContinue reading “Third Circuit Panel Splits Three Ways on Whether and How FDCPA Plaintiff Had Article III Standing Based on Ambiguous Balance Statement”

Split Ninth Circuit Panel Holds That Plaintiff Who Filed Original Securities Fraud Action Ceased to Be a Party When Court Appointed a Different Lead Plaintiff Under the PSLRA

In Habelt v. iRhythm Technologies, Inc., No. 22-15660 (9th Cir. Oct. 11, 2023), a 2-1 panel holds that the original putative lead plaintiff in a securities fraud case was no longer a “party” with standing to appeal when a different lead plaintiff was appointed by the district court under the Private Securities Litigation Reform ActContinue reading “Split Ninth Circuit Panel Holds That Plaintiff Who Filed Original Securities Fraud Action Ceased to Be a Party When Court Appointed a Different Lead Plaintiff Under the PSLRA”

Lack of Evidence About the Citizenship of a Limited Liability Company at the Time of the Filing of the Complaint Requires Remand, Holds Fifth Circuit

In SXSW, LLC v. Federal Insurance Co., No. 22-50933 (5th Cir. Oct. 5, 2023), the Fifth Circuit exercises its authority to remand an appeal to the district court to sort out factually whether there was diversity at the time the complaint was filed. Plaintiff “SXSW planned to hold its annual ‘South by Southwest’ festival inContinue reading “Lack of Evidence About the Citizenship of a Limited Liability Company at the Time of the Filing of the Complaint Requires Remand, Holds Fifth Circuit”

Eleventh Circuit Holds That a Former Employee Is Not an “Employee” Bound by an Injunction Under Fed. R. Civ. P. 65(d)

In United States v. Robinson, No. 22-10949 (11th Cir. Sept. 28, 2023), the Eleventh Circuit vacates the criminal contempt conviction of a former employee of an enjoined corporation, holding that former employees are not “employees” within the intendment of Fed. R. Civ. P. 65(d)(2) and that the government did not prosecute the defendant under theContinue reading “Eleventh Circuit Holds That a Former Employee Is Not an “Employee” Bound by an Injunction Under Fed. R. Civ. P. 65(d)”

Federal Equitable Power Did Not Extend to Returning Seized Cell Phone to “My Pillow” CEO, Holds Eighth Circuit

In Lindell v. United States, No. 22-3510 (8th Cir. Sept. 23, 2023), the Eighth Circuit affirms a district court’s denial of a preliminary injunction to MyPillow, Inc. and its Chief Executive Officer Michael Lindell to return “Lindell’s cell phone that was seized by federal agents on September 13, 2022.” The panel splits, though, on whetherContinue reading “Federal Equitable Power Did Not Extend to Returning Seized Cell Phone to “My Pillow” CEO, Holds Eighth Circuit”

Fifth Circuit Judge Expounds on Internal Operations, Castigates Justice Department in Dissent from Denial of Rehearing En Banc

In a dissent from denial of a sua sponte vote for rehearing en banc in a direct federal criminal appeal, United States v. Ramirez, No. 22-50042 (5th Cir. Sept. 19, 2023), Judge Jerry E. Smith rakes over the panel majority, the majority of active judges who voted against rehearing, and the Justice Department (for notContinue reading “Fifth Circuit Judge Expounds on Internal Operations, Castigates Justice Department in Dissent from Denial of Rehearing En Banc”

Eleventh Circuit Holds That Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) Stipulation Must Be Signed by All Parties Who Have Appeared in a Lawsuit to Be Effective, Creating Split with the Fifth Circuit

In City of Jacksonville v. Jacksonville Hospitality Holdings, L.P., No. 22-12419 (11th Cir. Sept. 13, 2023), the Eleventh Circuit holds in a matter of first impression that all parties to a case—not just those directly involved in the dismissal—must sign a Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) dismissal motion for it to be effective. Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii)Continue reading “Eleventh Circuit Holds That Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) Stipulation Must Be Signed by All Parties Who Have Appeared in a Lawsuit to Be Effective, Creating Split with the Fifth Circuit”

Tenth Circuit Holds District Court May Not Use Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) to Reopen a Case Voluntarily Dismissed Under Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a), Creating Split with the Fifth Circuit

In Waetzig v. Halliburton Energy Services, No. 22-1252 (10th Cir. Sept. 11, 2023), a 2-1 panel of the Tenth Circuit holds that a district court lacks power under Rule 60(b) to reopen a case voluntarily dismissed by a plaintiff under Rule 41(a), because such a dismissal is not a “a final judgment, order, or proceeding.”Continue reading “Tenth Circuit Holds District Court May Not Use Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) to Reopen a Case Voluntarily Dismissed Under Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a), Creating Split with the Fifth Circuit”

Eighth Circuit Holds That Stipulations About Citizenship Are Not Binding When Evaluating Diversity Jurisdiction, Signaling a Possible Split with Other Circuits

In Great River Entertainment, LLC v. Zurich American Ins. Co., No. 21-3815 (8th Cir. Sept. 11, 2023), the Eighth Circuit reverses and remands a final judgment dismissing this insurance coverage lawsuit, holding that—despite an admission by the plaintiff in the district court that the parties were diverse—the plaintiff could contradict that stipulation on appeal withContinue reading “Eighth Circuit Holds That Stipulations About Citizenship Are Not Binding When Evaluating Diversity Jurisdiction, Signaling a Possible Split with Other Circuits”