Subject-Matter Jurisdiction – Paul Mollica's Federal Courts Blog

Seventh Circuit Holds That “Local Event or Occurrence” Exception in Class Action Fairness Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1332(d)(11)(B)(ii)(I), Is Jurisdictional and Thus Non-Waivable, Even If Omitted from Plaintiff’s Motion for Remand

In Craig v City of Richmond, Ind., No. 26-1864 (7th Cir. June 18, 2026), in an issue of first impression, the panel holds that a district court may sua sponte remand a removed case to state court under the “local event or occurrence” exception, 28 U.S.C. § 1332(d)(11)(B)(ii)(I), even if the plaintiff did not seekContinue reading “Seventh Circuit Holds That “Local Event or Occurrence” Exception in Class Action Fairness Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1332(d)(11)(B)(ii)(I), Is Jurisdictional and Thus Non-Waivable, Even If Omitted from Plaintiff’s Motion for Remand”

In Fire-Dex, LLC v. Admiral Ins. Co., No. 24-3781 (6th Cir. June 2, 2025), the Sixth Circuit rejects the holdings of seven other circuits and holds that when a demand for relief under the Declaratory Judgment Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2201(a), is combined with a claim for injunctive relief or damages (“coercive relief”), it isContinue reading “Sixth Circuit Charts Its Own Course on Abstention from Declaratory Actions That Are Part of a “Mixed Action” Seeking Injunctive or Legal Relief”

In Kumar v. Koester, No. 23-4363 (9th Cir. Mar. 12, 2025), the Ninth Circuit dismisses a constitutional challenge to California State University’s anti-discrimination policy that was recently amended to add “caste” as a protected status. Effective January 1, 2022, CSU’s “Policy Prohibiting Discrimination, Harassment, Sexual Misconduct, Sexual Exploitation, Dating Violence, Domestic Violence, Stalking, and RetaliationContinue reading “Hindu Professors at State University Lacked Article III Standing to Challenge School’s “Caste” Discrimination Policy, Holds Ninth Circuit”

In Thompson v. Army and Air Force Exchange Service, No. 23-2447 (7th Cir. Jan. 8, 2025), the Seventh Circuit holds that a federal agency that removes an action from state court under 28 U.S.C. § 1442 is not entitled to dismissal in federal court on a finding that the federal court lacks subject-matter jurisdiction, andContinue reading “Federal Agencies Do Not Have An “Unfettered Right to Litigate in Federal Court” Under 28 U.S.C. § 1442, Holds Seventh Circuit”

In Continental Indem. Co. v. BII, Inc., N. 23-1648 (7th Cir. June 12, 2024), the Seventh Circuit affirms dismissal of an action filed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 69 by an insurer against an alleged garnishee, holding that it fell outside the court’s ancillary enforcement jurisdiction. The panel, though, reserves for future consideration whether theContinue reading “Seventh Circuit Questions Standard of Review for Orders Declining to Exercise Ancillary Enforcement Jurisdiction”

In Behrens v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., No. 21-2603 (2d Cir. Mar. 13, 2024), the Second Circuit publishes an opinion “to consider a question of first impression in this Circuit: whether the existence of subject-matter jurisdiction requires a district court to exercise it, even if it is invoked belatedly—on analogy to the rule that aContinue reading “Second Circuit Holds That a District Court Has No Duty to Consider a Belated Argument in Support of Subject-Matter Jurisdiction”

In Carroll v. Trump, No. 23-1045(L) (2d Cir. Dec. 13, 2023), the Second Circuit holds, in “a vexing question of first impression,” that absolute presidential immunity from suit is not jurisdictional, and – in this case – was waived when the former president failed to allege it as an affirmative defense in his answer. InContinue reading “Claim of Absolute Presidential Immunity Is Non-Jurisdictional and Waivable, Holds Second Circuit”

In Pool v. City of Houston, No. 22-2049 (5th Cir. Dec. 11, 2023), the Fifth Circuit dismisses a four-year-old First Amendment case for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction, where the court determines that “all parties have agreed from the beginning . . . that Houston’s [challenged] voter registration provisions governing circulators” are unconstitutional, and thus theContinue reading “Lack of “Adversity” Between Litigants Over a Constitutional Question Deprives Court of Article III Case or Controversy, Holds Fifth Circuit”

In SXSW, LLC v. Federal Insurance Co., No. 22-50933 (5th Cir. Oct. 5, 2023), the Fifth Circuit exercises its authority to remand an appeal to the district court to sort out factually whether there was diversity at the time the complaint was filed. Plaintiff “SXSW planned to hold its annual ‘South by Southwest’ festival inContinue reading “Lack of Evidence About the Citizenship of a Limited Liability Company at the Time of the Filing of the Complaint Requires Remand, Holds Fifth Circuit”

In Spivey v. Chitimacha Tribe, No. 22-30436 (5th Cir. Aug. 16, 2023), the Fifth Circuit joins the majority of circuits in holding that there is no “futility” exception to ordering the remand of a case to state court under 28 U.S.C. § 1447(c) when it determines that it lacks subject matter jurisdiction over a removedContinue reading “Fifth Circuit Rejects “Futility” Exception to 28 U.S.C. § 1447(c) Remand Requirement”