The Eleventh Circuit, in CMYK Enterprises, Inc. v. Advanced Print Technologies, LLC, No. 24-13766 (11th Cir. Sept. 12, 2025), rejects a common tactic used by parties to speed-up the appeal of a partial dispositive order, i.e., voluntarily dismissing the remaining claims under Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a). The panel holds that, by its plain terms,Continue reading “Eleventh Circuit Closes Off Resort to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a) to Dismiss Remaining Claims as an Expedient to Appeal Contested Claims Dismissed Under Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b)”
Tag Archives: Eleventh Circuit
Eleventh Circuit Holds That Fed. R. Civ. P. 21 and 41(a) Permits the Dismissal of a Single Plaintiff in a Multiple-Plaintiff Case, Provided That All of Their Claims Are Dismissed
The Eleventh Circuit in Weinstein v. 440 Corp., No. 23-13807 (11th Cir, July 25, 2025), holds that there is a final judgment when an individual plaintiff in a multi-plaintiff case voluntarily dismisses all of their claims against all defendants in a case under Fed. R. Civ. P. 21 or 41(a). Rule 41(a) allows a plaintiffContinue reading “Eleventh Circuit Holds That Fed. R. Civ. P. 21 and 41(a) Permits the Dismissal of a Single Plaintiff in a Multiple-Plaintiff Case, Provided That All of Their Claims Are Dismissed”
Eleventh Circuit Holds That There Is No Appellate Jurisdiction Over an Order That Both Denies Arbitration and Remands a Removed Case to State Court, Per 28 U.S.C. § 1447(d)
In Wu v. Liu, No. 24-10397 (11th Cir. Mar. 19, 2025), the Eleventh Circuit has to reconcile 28 U.S.C. § 1447(d), which bars appellate review of a district court remand of a removed case, and 9 U.S.C. § 16(a)(1)(C), which affirmatively grants appellate jurisdiction to review orders denying arbitration. For an order that both deniesContinue reading “Eleventh Circuit Holds That There Is No Appellate Jurisdiction Over an Order That Both Denies Arbitration and Remands a Removed Case to State Court, Per 28 U.S.C. § 1447(d)”
Eleventh Circuit Splits with Fifth in Holding That Non-Party Removal of a Case to Federal Court Is a Waivable Procedural Defect Subject to the 30-Day Limit Under § 1447(c)
In Wilson v. Hearos, LLC, No. 23-12550 (11th Cir. Feb. 18, 2025), the Eleventh Circuit holds that a plaintiff who failed to challenge a non-party’s removal of an action to federal court under the general removal statute, 28 U.S.C. § 1441(a), within the 30 days provided by 28 U.S.C. § 1447(c) waived his objection. TheContinue reading “Eleventh Circuit Splits with Fifth in Holding That Non-Party Removal of a Case to Federal Court Is a Waivable Procedural Defect Subject to the 30-Day Limit Under § 1447(c)”
“Boilerplate” Prayer in Complaint for “Just and Proper” Relief Did Not Rescue a Declaratory Judgment Action from Mootness, Holds the Eleventh Circuit
In Warren v. DeSantis, No. 23-10459 (11th Cir. Jan. 10, 2025) (per curiam), the Eleventh Circuit dismisses on mootness grounds a declaratory action by a Florida officeholder seeking to be reinstated as a state attorney, because plaintiff’s term of office expired during the pendency of the case. It rejects plaintiff’s argument that a prayer forContinue reading ““Boilerplate” Prayer in Complaint for “Just and Proper” Relief Did Not Rescue a Declaratory Judgment Action from Mootness, Holds the Eleventh Circuit”
District Court Did Not Err in Denying Defense Attorney Leave to Show Previously-Unseen Video Clips During Closing Argument, Holds Eleventh Circuit
In United States v. Simmons, No. 22-12148 (11th Cir. Dec. 6, 2024), the Eleventh Circuit affirms a drug and firearm possession conviction, holding that the district court did not err by preventing the defense lawyer from showing excerpts from a video exhibit in closing arguments that were not previously shown to the jury. “During itsContinue reading “District Court Did Not Err in Denying Defense Attorney Leave to Show Previously-Unseen Video Clips During Closing Argument, Holds Eleventh Circuit”
No Championship Season for Sectarian Football Team Seeking Injunction to Commandeer the PA System for Prayer, Holds Eleventh Circuit
In Cambridge Christian School, Inc. v. Florida High School Athletic Association, Inc., 22-11222 (11th Cir. Sept. 3, 2024), a Free Exercise case brought on behalf of a Christian-school football team, the panel holds that the plaintiff had no standing for declaratory or injunctive relief to use the stadium public-address system for group prayer, where itContinue reading “No Championship Season for Sectarian Football Team Seeking Injunction to Commandeer the PA System for Prayer, Holds Eleventh Circuit”
Eleventh Circuit Affirms Judgment as a Matter of Law Tossing a $300 Million Verdict, Owing to Admission of Hearsay Valuation Evidence, Yet Remands for a New Trial on Damages
In Taxinet Corp. v. Leon, No. 22-12335 (11th Cir. Aug. 19, 2024), the Eleventh Circuit affirms judgment as a matter of law that wiped out a $300 million jury verdict on a state law unjust-enrichment claim, after the district court held that it erred in admitting hearsay valuation evidence. Yet the panel exercises discretion toContinue reading “Eleventh Circuit Affirms Judgment as a Matter of Law Tossing a $300 Million Verdict, Owing to Admission of Hearsay Valuation Evidence, Yet Remands for a New Trial on Damages”
Eleventh Circuit Judge, in Concurring Opinion, Challenges Expansion of Younger Abstention as Chilling First Amendment Rights
In a case involving Stacey Abrams’ New Georgia Project, the Eleventh Circuit holds in New Georgia Project, Inc., et al v. Attorney General, State of Georgia, No. 22-14302 (11th Cir. July 8, 2024), that federal litigation of a challenge to Georgia’s campaign laws must await the conclusion of a state administrative enforcement action against theContinue reading “Eleventh Circuit Judge, in Concurring Opinion, Challenges Expansion of Younger Abstention as Chilling First Amendment Rights”
District Court Judge Who Turned Jury Trial Over to a Magistrate to Catch His Flight Voided the Verdict, Holds Eleventh Circuit
In TB Foods USA, LLC v. American Mariculture, Inc., No. 22-12936 (11th Cir. June 18, 2024), the Eleventh Circuit holds that even when the parties agree to a substitution of a magistrate judge to receive the verdict at the end of a jury trial, they do not necessarily consent to the magistrate performing Article IIIContinue reading “District Court Judge Who Turned Jury Trial Over to a Magistrate to Catch His Flight Voided the Verdict, Holds Eleventh Circuit”
Paul Mollica's Federal Courts Blog 