In Hunter v. MacMahon, No. 21-1473 (2d Cir. July 21, 2023), the Second Circuit joins the First, Third, Fifth, Seventh, Eighth, Ninth, Tenth, and Eleventh Circuits in holding that the Rooker-Feldman doctrine does not extend to a federal lawsuit challenging the effects of a state-court judgment when a state-court appeal from that judgment remains pending.Continue reading “Second Circuit Joins Other U.S. Courts of Appeals in Holding That Rooker-Feldman Does Not Apply to a State Case That Is Still on Appeal in State Court”
Author Archives: pwmollica1961
Split Eighth Circuit Panel Holds That Voluntary Dismissal of Pending Claims Against Some Defendants Without Prejudice Did Not Create “Final Decision” or Appellate Jurisdiction Under 28 U.S.C. § 1291
In City of Burnsville v. Koppers, Inc., No. 21-3177 (8th Cir. July 19, 2023), a split Eight Circuit panel dismisses an appeal that it holds arose from a non-final judgment, where the parties agreed to voluntarily dismiss all remaining claims without prejudice to appeal a contested issue of law. “Several cities in Minnesota allege thatContinue reading “Split Eighth Circuit Panel Holds That Voluntary Dismissal of Pending Claims Against Some Defendants Without Prejudice Did Not Create “Final Decision” or Appellate Jurisdiction Under 28 U.S.C. § 1291”
Seventh Circuit Contributes to Circuit Split About Whether a Breach of Contract Alone Is a Sufficient “Injury in Fact” for Article III Standing Purposes
In Dinerstein v. Google, LLC, No. 20-3134 (7th Cir. July 11, 2023), the Seventh Circuit is invited to decide whether a university hospital’s alleged disclosure of patient data to an on-line giant constituted a violation of state tort, contract or statutory law. But the panel bypasses this dispute and holds instead that the lead plaintiffContinue reading “Seventh Circuit Contributes to Circuit Split About Whether a Breach of Contract Alone Is a Sufficient “Injury in Fact” for Article III Standing Purposes”
Settlement Agreement That Paid Plaintiff $100,000 to Take an Appeal Did Not Deprive Court of “Case or Controversy,” Holds Divided, En Banc Elventh Circuit
In Carson v. Mansanto Co., No. 21-10994 (11th Cir. July 10, 2023), the en banc Eleventh Circuit holds that it has appellate jurisdiction to adjudicate a dispute about whether a “federal agency action that otherwise lacks the force of law preempts the requirements of state law,” despite the complication that the defendant paid the plaintiffContinue reading “Settlement Agreement That Paid Plaintiff $100,000 to Take an Appeal Did Not Deprive Court of “Case or Controversy,” Holds Divided, En Banc Elventh Circuit”
Fifth Circuit Panel Splits Three Ways on Effect of Cessation of Navy COVID-19 Vaccine Mandate on Appellate Jurisdiction
Other federal courts of appeals have had little difficulty concluding that the end of the military’s COVID-19 vaccine mandate – as legislated in the James M. Inhofe National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) in 2022 –renders moot all pending litigation concerning injunctive relief from the rule. Just yesterday, the Tenth Circuit in Robert v. Austin, No.Continue reading “Fifth Circuit Panel Splits Three Ways on Effect of Cessation of Navy COVID-19 Vaccine Mandate on Appellate Jurisdiction”
Anonymity for Plaintiff Properly Revoked When Litigant Sought Publicity and “Disseminated Sensitive Material” About the Defendant, Holds Tenth Circuit
In Luo v. Wang, No. 22-1200 (10th Cir. July 3, 2023), a rare published opinion about the revocation of a pseudonym in a civil case, the Tenth Circuit affirms the lower courts reconsideration of the plaintiff’s use of the “Jane Doe” appellation when it came to light that the plaintiff had been seeking media attentionContinue reading “Anonymity for Plaintiff Properly Revoked When Litigant Sought Publicity and “Disseminated Sensitive Material” About the Defendant, Holds Tenth Circuit”
Eleventh Circuit Holds That District Court Erred in Disregarding Jury Finding Made by Consent of the Parties in Accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 39(c)(2)
In Thomas v. Broward County Sheriff’s Office, No. 22-11322 (11th Cir. June 22, 2023), the Eleventh Circuit holds in a Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act (USERRA) case that the district court was required to accept a finding of a willful violation entered by the jury on a special interrogatory when the parties consentedContinue reading “Eleventh Circuit Holds That District Court Erred in Disregarding Jury Finding Made by Consent of the Parties in Accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 39(c)(2)”
Fifth Circuit Holds That Employers Have Standing to Pursue Pre-Enforcement Challenge to the EEOC’s Enforcement Guidance on Bostock
In Braidwood Mgt. v. EEOC, No. 22-10145 (5th Cir. June 20, 2023), the Fifth Circuit holds that a for-profit “Christian” business and a non-denominational Christian church suffered a concrete injury from prospective enforcement of a guidance by the federal Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) sufficient to support Article III standing. The guidance at issue isContinue reading “Fifth Circuit Holds That Employers Have Standing to Pursue Pre-Enforcement Challenge to the EEOC’s Enforcement Guidance on Bostock”
Don’t Make A Federal Case Out Of It: Seventh Circuit Considers A Lawsuit For $3.95
In Mack v. Resurgent Capital Servs., L.P., No. 21-2792 (7th Cir. June 7, 2023), the Seventh Circuit reverses and remands a Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA) lawsuit brought to collect $3.95 in postage, a claim held by the panel to confer Article III standing to bring the case in federal court. Since the SupremeContinue reading “Don’t Make A Federal Case Out Of It: Seventh Circuit Considers A Lawsuit For $3.95”
Split Fourth Circuit Panel Holds That Fed. R. Civ. P. 52 and 65 Standards for Injunctive Relief Applied to Prohibitory Order Enforcing Settlement Agreement
In Wudi Industrial (Shanghai) Co., Ltd. v. Wai Wong, No. 22-1495 (4th Cir. June 5, 2023), a 2-1 panel of the Fourth Circuit holds that the district court procedurally erred when it ordered a party to a settlement to “immediately cease” certain conduct prohibited by their agreement, holding that the judge was obliged to enterContinue reading “Split Fourth Circuit Panel Holds That Fed. R. Civ. P. 52 and 65 Standards for Injunctive Relief Applied to Prohibitory Order Enforcing Settlement Agreement”
Paul Mollica's Federal Courts Blog 