In Hoffman v. Lindgren, No. 22-35471 (9th Cir. Sept. 1, 2023), the Ninth Circuit resolves an intracircuit split and holds that no leniency is due to pro se litigants who are also licensed, practicing attorneys. “Huffman, a practicing attorney, sued a municipal court judge, a prosecutor, and the City of St. Helens, Oregon in ColumbiaContinue reading “No Leniency for a Pro Se Litigant Who Is Also a Licensed Attorney, Holds Ninth Circuit”
Tag Archives: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Eighth Circuit Holds That There Is No Subject-Matter Jurisdiction Over Removed Case Once Plaintiff Amends Their Complaint to Strip Out All Federal-Law Allegations, Noting Split with Second and Fifth Circuits
In Wullschleger v. Royal Canin U.S.A., Inc., No. 22-1796 (8th Cir. July 31, 2023), on its second trip to the Eighth Circuit, the court holds that a class-action plaintiff successfully outfoxed the defendants by promptly amending their removed complaint to strike out all federal-law allegations, thus depriving the district court of subject-matter jurisdiction. This isContinue reading “Eighth Circuit Holds That There Is No Subject-Matter Jurisdiction Over Removed Case Once Plaintiff Amends Their Complaint to Strip Out All Federal-Law Allegations, Noting Split with Second and Fifth Circuits”
No Federal-Question Jurisdiction Over Declaratory Action Complaint to Block Federal-Law Defense, Holds Eleventh Circuit
In Patel v. Hamilton Medical Center, Inc., No. 19-13088 (11th Cir. July 30, 2020), the Eleventh Circuit holds that there is no federal-question subject matter jurisdiction over a declaratory action brought by a doctor against a hospital for suspending his privileges. Although the plaintiff’s claim arose under state law (and the parties were apparently non-diverse),Continue reading “No Federal-Question Jurisdiction Over Declaratory Action Complaint to Block Federal-Law Defense, Holds Eleventh Circuit”
Paul Mollica's Federal Courts Blog 