Author Archives: pwmollica1961

Grant of Preliminary Injunction by One Judge in the District Moots Appeal of Denial of Preliminary Injuction by Another Judge, Holds Tenth Circuit

In We the Patriots, et al. v. Grisham, No. 23-2066 (10th Cir. Oct. 28, 2024), the Tenth Circuit dismisses an appeal of the denial of preliminary injunction where, in a different case in the same district, another judge granted the same relief. This is important for cases governed by “prevailing party” fee-shifting statutes, because ifContinue reading “Grant of Preliminary Injunction by One Judge in the District Moots Appeal of Denial of Preliminary Injuction by Another Judge, Holds Tenth Circuit”

Ninth Circuit Reassigns a Case Where the Judge and Defendant Formerly Clerked Together for the Same Ninth Circuit Judge

In Creech v. U.S. Dist. Ct. for the District of Idaho, No. 24-4455 (9th Cir. Oct. 16, 2024), the Ninth Circuit grants mandamus to remove a district court judge in a case where the judge admitted a long-term friendship with one of the defendants, going back to when they were Ninth Circuit clerks. This comesContinue reading “Ninth Circuit Reassigns a Case Where the Judge and Defendant Formerly Clerked Together for the Same Ninth Circuit Judge”

State Need Not Allege A “Policy or Practice” Violation Against a Class of Citizens to Have Parens Patriae Standing in Federal Court, Second Circuit Holds

In New York v. Niagara-Wheatfield Central Sch. Dist., No. 22-2178 (2d Cir. Oct. 15, 2024), the Second Circuit reverses a Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(c) judgment on the pleadings, holding that the State of New York pled sufficient grounds for parens patriae standing without alleging a policy-or-practice violation against a target population of state residents.Continue reading “State Need Not Allege A “Policy or Practice” Violation Against a Class of Citizens to Have Parens Patriae Standing in Federal Court, Second Circuit Holds”

Fifth Circuit Orders Removal of District Court Judge from Institutional Reform Lawsuit for Alleged “Intemperate Conduct” During Contempt Proceedings

In M.D. v. Abbott, No. 24-40248 (5th Cir. Oct. 11, 2024), a Fifth Circuit panel reverses an order of contempt against the State of Texas and orders reassignment of a case involving the state’s foster care system to another federal district court judge. “Plaintiffs are a class of minor children who challenged the constitutionality ofContinue reading “Fifth Circuit Orders Removal of District Court Judge from Institutional Reform Lawsuit for Alleged “Intemperate Conduct” During Contempt Proceedings”

Corporation Counsel of the City of New York Draws A Rebuke from the Second Circuit for Waiting Two Years to Raise Jurisdictional Standing Issue

In Bochner v. City of New York, No. 23-683 (2d Cir. Oct. 7, 2024), while adopting the city defendants’ argument that the plaintiffs lacked jurisdictional standing, the Second Circuit twits the city’s corporation counsel for waiting two years to raise the issue and—for “failure to exercise reasonable diligence in identifying and raising jurisdictional questions earlyContinue reading “Corporation Counsel of the City of New York Draws A Rebuke from the Second Circuit for Waiting Two Years to Raise Jurisdictional Standing Issue”

Document Created 19 Days Before Trial Was Not A “Business Record” For Purposes of Hearsay Exception Fed. R. Evid. 803(6), Holds Tenth Circuit

In United States v. Harper, No. 23-5091 (10th Cir. Oct. 3, 2024), the Tenth Circuit reverses the kidnapping conviction where the only record of an essential jurisdictional element was a verification letter generated shortly before trial that the panel holds cannot thereby stand as a business record under Fed. R. Evid. 803(6). The defendant wasContinue reading “Document Created 19 Days Before Trial Was Not A “Business Record” For Purposes of Hearsay Exception Fed. R. Evid. 803(6), Holds Tenth Circuit”

Removal of Case from State to Federal Court Does Not Affect Application of First-Filed Rule, Split Eighth Circuit Panel Holds

In Beber v. NavSav Holdings, LLC, No. 23-2965 (8th Cir. Oct. 1, 2024), a 2-1 panel holds, in dueling lawsuits over noncompete and nonsolicitation covenants, that a first-filed case commenced in Nebraska state court remained first-filed even when removed to federal district court. Judge Kelly dissents in part. On June 16, 2023, employees Beber, Roach,Continue reading “Removal of Case from State to Federal Court Does Not Affect Application of First-Filed Rule, Split Eighth Circuit Panel Holds”

State of Texas Has No Seventh Amendment Right to a Jury Trial for Border Barrier Defense, Holds Fifth Circuit

In In re Greg Abbott, No. 24-50620 (5th Cir. Sept. 20, 2024), the Fifth Circuit denies mandamus in a case where Texas unsuccessfully demanded for a jury trial in a suit by the United States to remove a 1000-foot border obstruction. The panel holds that the state has no demonstrated Seventh Amendment right to aContinue reading “State of Texas Has No Seventh Amendment Right to a Jury Trial for Border Barrier Defense, Holds Fifth Circuit”

Federal Judge Who Spoke Over 80% of Defendant’s Allocution Did Not Commit Plain Error, Split Seventh Circuit Panel Holds

In United States v. Bowyer, No. 23-3169 (7th Cir. Sept. 18, 2024), a 2-1 panel upheld a conviction over an argument that a district court judge effectively deprived the defendant of his right to allocution, dominating the procedure by his own bench comments. Judge Jackson-Akiwumi files a dissent. “Andre Bowyer, a national of Jamaica, pleadedContinue reading “Federal Judge Who Spoke Over 80% of Defendant’s Allocution Did Not Commit Plain Error, Split Seventh Circuit Panel Holds”

Attorney’s Fee Award Only Became Final When the District Court “Quantifi[ed]” It, Leading to Partial Dismissal of Appeal by Eighth Circuit

In Deering v. Lockheed Martin Corp., No. 23-2853 (8th Cir. Sept. 17, 2024), the Eighth Circuit dismisses in part an appeal of sanctions against an employment-discrimination plaintiff because she filed the notice of appeal before the judge below calculated the attorney’s fees, then failed to amend the notice to appeal the fee award. According toContinue reading “Attorney’s Fee Award Only Became Final When the District Court “Quantifi[ed]” It, Leading to Partial Dismissal of Appeal by Eighth Circuit”