In Sullers v Int’l Union Elevator Constructors, Local #2, No. 24-1719 (7th Cir. June 27, 2025), a litigant in the Seventh Circuit barely avoids having their appeal dismissed on the grounds of inadequate briefing under Fed. R. Civ. P. 28. The case involved an allegation of breach of the duty of fair representation against theContinue reading “Seventh Circuit Contemplates How Little Is Too Little Briefing to Compel Dismissal Under Fed. R. App. P. 28”
Author Archives: pwmollica1961
Tenth Circuit Holds That Federal Claim Preclusion Applies to Supplemental State-Law Claim Dismissed Without Prejudice in First Federal Action, If Plaintiff Could Have Originally Asserted Diversity Jurisdiction Over That Claim
In Markley v. U.S. Bank NA, No. 24-1163 (10th Cir. June 24, 2025), the Tenth Circuit opens up a potential trap for the unwary, holding that if “a party could have litigated a claim in a prior lawsuit by asserting diversity jurisdiction but fails to do so,” then that claim is precluded in a secondContinue reading “Tenth Circuit Holds That Federal Claim Preclusion Applies to Supplemental State-Law Claim Dismissed Without Prejudice in First Federal Action, If Plaintiff Could Have Originally Asserted Diversity Jurisdiction Over That Claim”
Sixth Circuit Holds That Placement of a Website Server in a State Does Not Automatically Expose Those Who Use It to Personal Jurisdiction There
In Carbone v. Kaal, No. 24-3795 (6th Cir. June 20, 2025), the Sixth Circuit affirms the dismissal of a tort action under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(2), holding that though the defendants allegedly transmitted defamatory statements through a server in Ohio, this fact alone did not support laying specific personal jurisdiction in that forum. “Robert Carbone,Continue reading “Sixth Circuit Holds That Placement of a Website Server in a State Does Not Automatically Expose Those Who Use It to Personal Jurisdiction There”
Fifth Circuit Holds That The District Court Must Assure That the Class Recieves Notice of Attorney Fees Under Fed. R. Civ. P. 23(h), Even If No Party Objects to Its Omission
In Morrow v. Jones, No. 23-40546 (5th Cir. June 10, 2025), the Fifth Circuit holds that it is reversible error for the district court to not issue notice of a motion for attorney fees as required by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23(h), even if nobody objects to the omission. In a Fourth Amendment caseContinue reading “Fifth Circuit Holds That The District Court Must Assure That the Class Recieves Notice of Attorney Fees Under Fed. R. Civ. P. 23(h), Even If No Party Objects to Its Omission”
Sixth Circuit Charts Its Own Course on Abstention from Declaratory Actions That Are Part of a “Mixed Action” Seeking Injunctive or Legal Relief
In Fire-Dex, LLC v. Admiral Ins. Co., No. 24-3781 (6th Cir. June 2, 2025), the Sixth Circuit rejects the holdings of seven other circuits and holds that when a demand for relief under the Declaratory Judgment Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2201(a), is combined with a claim for injunctive relief or damages (“coercive relief”), it isContinue reading “Sixth Circuit Charts Its Own Course on Abstention from Declaratory Actions That Are Part of a “Mixed Action” Seeking Injunctive or Legal Relief”
En Banc Fifth Circuit Holds That Waiver-Based Remand Orders Are Appealable Under 28 U.S.C. § 1447, Overruling the Circuit’s Long-Standing Contrary Authority
In Abraham Watkins Nichols Agosto Aziz & Stogner v. Festeryga, No. 23-20337 (5th Cir. May 16, 2025) (en banc), the Fifth Circuit unanimously overrules a 45-year-old circuit precedent and holds that an order remanding a removed case based on the defendant’s alleged waiver by participation in a state-court case falls within the court’s appellate jurisdictionContinue reading “En Banc Fifth Circuit Holds That Waiver-Based Remand Orders Are Appealable Under 28 U.S.C. § 1447, Overruling the Circuit’s Long-Standing Contrary Authority”
Divided Fifth Circuit Panel Splits with Ninth Circuit and Adopts a “Same Product Plus In-State Injury” Test of Relatedness for Personal Jurisdiction in a Product Liability Case
In Yamashita v. LG Chem, Ltd., 62 F.4th 496 (9th Cir. 2023), the Ninth Circuit held that a products liability case involving an exploding lithium battery did not “arise out of or relate to” the South Korean manufacturer’s contacts with the forum state for purposes of personal jurisdiction. (See March 6, 2023 post, Ninth CircuitContinue reading “Divided Fifth Circuit Panel Splits with Ninth Circuit and Adopts a “Same Product Plus In-State Injury” Test of Relatedness for Personal Jurisdiction in a Product Liability Case”
Judge Exceeded Civil Contempt Powers by Ordering Defense Lawyers to Attend “Religious-Liberty Training,” Holds Fifth Circuit
In Carter v. Southwest Airlines Co. No. 23-10536 (5th Cir. May 8, 2025), while substantially affirming a contempt finding against Southwest for failing to carry out an order to notify the workplace – about the Title VII right to engage in religious-practices – holds that the district court went too far in ordering company lawyersContinue reading “Judge Exceeded Civil Contempt Powers by Ordering Defense Lawyers to Attend “Religious-Liberty Training,” Holds Fifth Circuit”
Diversity Allegations on “Information and Belief” Are Insufficient to Establish Subject-Matter Jurisdiction Beyond the Pleadings Stage and Judicial Notice Under Fed. R. Evid. 201 Cannot Bridge the Gap, Holds Fifth Circuit
In PNC Bank v. 2013 Travis Oak, No. 24-50101 (5th Cir. May 5, 2025), the Fifth Circuit remands the appeal of actions to enforce a settlement agreement, holding that claims severed from the original action require a separate, independent basis for diversity jurisdiction, and that the jurisdictional allegations in the complaint “on information and belief”Continue reading “Diversity Allegations on “Information and Belief” Are Insufficient to Establish Subject-Matter Jurisdiction Beyond the Pleadings Stage and Judicial Notice Under Fed. R. Evid. 201 Cannot Bridge the Gap, Holds Fifth Circuit”
Fifth Circuit Holds That State-Law Sovereign Immunity Doctrines Do Not Affect the Jurisdiction of Federal Courts
While state-law sovereign immunity doctrines apply in state court by virtue of Erie R.R. Co. v. Tompkins, 304 U.S. 64 (1938), the Fifth Circuit holds in Anthology, Inc. v. Tarrant Cnty. Coll. Dist. (TCCD), No. 24-10630 (5th Cir. May 2, 2025), that they are treated as defenses and do not affect Article III subject-matter jurisdiction.Continue reading “Fifth Circuit Holds That State-Law Sovereign Immunity Doctrines Do Not Affect the Jurisdiction of Federal Courts”
Paul Mollica's Federal Courts Blog 